Impact History of Eros: Craters and Boulders

Preliminary measurements of craters and boulders have been made in various locations on Eros from images acquired during the first nine months of NEAR Shoemaker’s orbital mission, including the October 2000 low altitude flyover. (We offer some very preliminary, qualitative analysis of later LAF images and very highresolution images obtained during NEAR’s landing on 12 February 2001). Craters on Eros >100 m diameter closely resemble the saturated crater population of Ida; Eros is more heavily cratered than Gaspra but lacks the saturated giant craters of Mathilde. These craters and the other large-scale geological features were formed over a duration of very roughly 2 Gyr while Eros was in the main asteroid belt, between the time when its parent body was disrupted and Eros was injected into an Earth-approaching orbit (probably tens of Myr ago). Saturation equilibrium had been expected to shape Eros’ crater population down to very small sizes, as on the lunar maria. However, craters <200 m diameter are instead progressively depleted toward smaller sizes and are a factor of ∼200 below empirical saturation at diameters of 4 m. Conversely, boulders and positive relief features (PRFs) rise rapidly in numbers (differential power-law index ∼−5) and those <10 m in size dominate the landscape at high resolutions. The pervasive boulders and minimal craters on Eros is radically different from the lunar surface at similar scales. This may be partly explained by a major depletion of meter-scale projectiles in the asteroid belt (due to the Yarkovsky Effect: Bell 2001), which thus form few small craters and destroy few boulders. Additionally, the small size and low gravity of Eros may result in redistribution or loss of ejecta due to seismic shaking, thus preferentially destroying small craters formed in such regolith. Possibly Eros has only a patchy, thin regolith of mobile fines; the smaller PRFs may then reflect exposures of fractured bedrock or piles of large ejecta blocks, which might further inhibit formation of craters <10 m in size. Eros may well have been largely detached dynamically and collisionally from the main asteroid belt for the past tens of Myr, in which case its cratering rate would have dropped by two orders of magnitude, perhaps enhancing the relative efficacy of other processes that would normally be negligible in competition with cratering. Such processes include thermal creep, electrostatic levitation and redistribution of fines, and space weathering (e.g., bombardment by micrometeorites and solar wind particles). Combined with other small-body responses to impact cratering (e.g., greater widespread distribution of bouldery ejecta), such processes may also help explain the unexpected small-scale character of geology on Eros. If there was a recent virtual hiatus in cratering of Eros (during which only craters <∼300 m diameter would be expected to have formed), space weathering may have reached maturity, thus explaining Eros’ remarkable spectral homogeneity compared with Ida. c © 2002 Elsevier Science (USA)